1
alıntıdır: http://bordomavipusula.blogspot.com.tr/...-hattna-sikayet.html
aşağıda bordo mavi pusula'dan alıntı (büyük ihtimal ender kuyumcu imzalı) yazıyı göreceksiniz. ben nacizane bir başka girizgah yapmak isterim:
http://www.osahne.com/...ar.html#.U9ty2ON_sVe
"değerli arkadaşlar;
fifa'dan sonra uefa da şike ve usulsüzlüklerin bildirilmesi için bir şikâyet hattı oluşturdu ve bu hatta ister isminizi vererek isterse bilgilerinizi saklayarak şikâyette bulunabiliyorsunuz.
bizler de yeni kampanyamızda tff'nin yaptığı usulsüzlükleri ve uefa'nın şike davasını zamana yaymasının kabul edilemez olduğunu bu hatta bildiriyoruz.
şikâyet metni:
list of complaints:
1) turkish football federation protected match fixers by not relegating them as stated in its disciplinary regulations.
2) according to turkish prime minister, şenes erzik, vice president of uefa, played a key role between turkish prime minister, recep tayyip erdoğan, and mr. michel platini, which took the pressure of uefa off the turkish football federation.
3) according to cas award regarding fenerbahce case, uefa protected match fixers by not penalising them for match fixing. ( see clauses 575,576,577 below)
4) although uefa announced that the sanctions of individuals in this case were going to be announced as soon as possible over a year ago, uefa is yet to announce this decision.
5) tff signed a resolution about fighting against match fixing with uefa in astana, but failed to apply this aggreement on match fixers. ( see clauses 5f, 5g and 10 for more info on sanctions must be applied to match fixers)
fao uefa officer,
turkish football federation has been protecting teams involved in match fixing by not applying the disciplinary regulations stated in ıts status. all teams involved in match fixing must be relegated, but tff chose to protect these teams as a result of political intervention.
according to the turkish football federation disciplinary code 55/1(b) ; teams, whose board members are involved in match fixing or bribery, must be relegated to a lower division, but tff failed to apply this code so far…
on the other hand uefa failed to make sure tff follows the procedures...
before expressing the expectations of millions in turkey and all over the world from uefa, let’s have a look at some clauses of the resolution signed between uefa and the national federations in astana in 27.03.2014. which will give us an indication for our request;
article - 5. pursuant to their own regulations and practice and subject to the application of national law, to:
f) ensure that, in addition to individuals, clubs are also held responsible and sanctioned in circumstances where those with authority to act on behalf of the club are involved in match-fixing, attempted match-fixing, or any other form of corruption linked to match-fixing;
g) exclude match-fixing, attempted match-fixing, and any other form of corruption linked to match-fixing from any kind of statute of limitations.
article - 10. all member associations of uefa re-affirm that match-fixing, attempted match-fixing or other forms of corruption linked to match-fixing must be met with strong and sporting sanctions, such as the possibility of lifetime bans for officials, players, coaches or referees, and measures such as the deduction of points and/or relegation and/or exclusion from competition for clubs.
therefore, as turkish fans seeking justice, we expect uefa to act according to the statutes stated below and either make sure tff relegates fenerv-bahce sk and all other teams involved in match fixing and ban the individuals from football or suspend tff’s membership;
withdrawal and termination of membership, exclusion, dissolution of a member association:
article 8/ 3
a member association may be excluded from uefa if it has:
b) seriously breached these statutes or a regulation or decision made under them;
suspension: article 9; 1) if, in the opinion of the executive committee, a member association has committed a serious breach of these statutes or regulations or decisions made under them, the executive committee shall be entitled to suspend the membership of the member association with immediate effect.
therefore; it is fair to say that all teams involved in match fixing must be relegated and all individuals involved in match fixing must be banned from football up to life time in order to maintain the integrity of the game and make sure fair play is obtained.
according to swiss law, uefa board members and uefa appeals body members are committing a crime by misusing their duties and this is unacceptable.
most dissappointing part of this case for fans who trust uefa was after reading the cas award regarding fenerbahce sk case, millions in turkey have no doubt that uefa is part of this corruption too. uefa, not only protected fenerbahce sk from heavier sanction by not judging them from match fixing offence, but also prevented cas to inrease the sanction by not filing in an idependent apeal against the appealed decision. (see cas award below for details)
cas award:
575. in practise, this spectrum would mean that a "standard" match-fixing offence would, in principle, have to be sanctioned with a two-year period of ineligibility. in case of particularly serious match-fixing offences a higher sanction would have to be imposed and in case of mitigating circumstances the standard two-year period of ineligibility would have to be reduced.
576. in light of this spectrum of sanctions and considering that the match-fixing attempts initiated by fenerbahce's officials were particularly serious in comparison with previous match-fixing cases, the panel has no doubt to determine that a sanction from the higher region of this spectrum is warranted. the panel thereby specifically considers the fact that fenerbahce officials attempted to fix four matches, that multiple high-ranked fenerbahce officials were involved in the match-fixing scheme and that the match-fixing operations were conducted and orchestrated from the top administrative level of the club.
577. however, as uefa did not file an independent appeal against the appealed decision, the panel finds that it is limited in its discretion to sanction fenerbahce as it deems fit because it cannot go beyond the sanction imposed by the uefa appeals body. this would constitute a ruling ultra petita. as such, the panel cannot impose a higher sanction than a two-year period of ineligibility (in addition to the period of ineligibility already served through the equivalent of the "administrative measure") in the present appeals arbitration proceedings.
on the other hand uefa accepted fenerbahce sk's complaint regarding trabzonspor straight after lauching an investigation on fenerbahce sk even though trabzonspor was cleared off all charges at court, at ethical committee reports and at professional discipline committee trials… an application from a convicted match fixing criminal, such as fenerbahce sk, should had been declined by uefa, but uefa chose to take this appliction in to account, probably to justify their wrong doings in penalising fenerbahce sk with minimum sanction, rather than a heavier one as cas stated in its award. we see this as a threat to trabzonspor for defending their rights.
in the light of this threat, we would like to inform uefa officails once more that, we are aware of the relations and the talks between turkish prime minister, uefa’s president mr. michel platini and uefa vice-president şenes erzik, which changed mr. platini’s approach to the case dramatically. sponsorship of fenerbahce vice-president’s bank to uefa during the process and meeting took place in cyprus between platini and people from fenerbahce sk board are other key factors that changed platini’s, hence uefa’s approach to this case too…
another milestone to this case was the meeting between former presidents of turkish football federation (tff) and mr. platini took place in cyprus. mehmet ali aydınlar, former tff president, told press that he had a chance to convince mr. platini for point deduction rather than relegation at this meeting.
uefa also helped turkish authorities keep match fixers in football by not revealing sanctions of individuals. it has been over a year and uefa is yet to reach a verdict regarding individuals, where uefa declared that the verdicts were to be announced as soon as possible over a year ago.
with uefa's help turkish authorities kept aziz yıldırım outside the prision and with turkish pm's order a speacially picked court decided for a re-trial with no grounds. it was no surprise for turkish people that a retrial was decided by the new assigned court, as turkish pm promised a retrial to aziz yıldırım on the 22nd of january 2014, straight after supreme court certified his penalty on the 17th of january 2014.
regards
yapılacak olanlar:
1) ekteki linki kes yapıştır yoluyla internet arama çubuğuna kopyalayın: https://uefa.integrityline.org/# ve sağ üst köşedeki dil seçeneğinin ingilizce (english) olduğundan emin olun.
2) ''file a report'' yazan kutucuğu tıklayın şikâyet işlemine başlayın.
3) ''what is it about?'' kısmında, ortadaki seçenek olan ''corruption'' seçeneğini işaretleyin ve ''next'' kutucuğunu tıklayın
4) ''your personal details'' kısmı kişisel bilgilerinizi girdiğiniz kısımdır. kişisel bilgilerinizin gizli kalmasını istiyorsanız ''i would like to remain anonymous'' yazan kısmın başındaki kutuda yer alan işareti bırakın, size mail ya da başka bir yolla geri dönüş yapılmasını istiyorsanız kutucukta yer alan işareti üstüne tıklayarak kaldırın ve bilgilerinizi girin.
bilgilerini vermek isteyenler için:
first name: isminiz
last name: soy isminiz
position: ''football fan'' yazabilirsiniz.
e-mail kısmına mail adresinizi yazın.
phone number kısmına da türkiye'nin alan kodu olan 0090'la başlayarak telefonunuzu yazın.
son olarak da sağ alt köşede yer alan ''next'' kutucuğunu tıklayıp bir sonraki aşamaya geçin.
5) şikâyetinizi detaylı olarak anlatmanız istenen ''detailed description'' bölümü açılacak ve sizden konuyla ilgili bilgi vermeniz istenecek.
ilk kutucuk olan ''please describe the incident as accurately and in as much detail possible'' kısmına ''t f f and u e f a must act against match fixers in order to maintain justice anf prove that they are not part of corruption'' yazın
6) ''name of home and away team'' kısmına ''convicted match fixers'' yazın.
7) ''match date'' kısmını boş bırakın
8) ''competition'' kısmına ''domestic'' yazın.
9) ''how did you hear about this incident'' kısmına ''common knowledge'' yazın.
10) ''do you have any proof to support your information'' kısmına ''yes.'' yazın ve sağ alt köşede yer alan ''next'' kutucuğunu tıklayın.
11) yeni açılan ''upload documents'' kısmına yükleyebilmek için yukarıda yer alan ''metni bir word dosyasına kaydedin'' ve ''search'' kutucuğuna tıklayarak bilgisayarınıza kaydetmiş olduğunuz bu dosyayı yükleyin ve ''upload'' kutucuğuna tıklayarak yüklemeyi tamamlandıktan sonra sağ alt köşedeki ''next'' kutucuğuna tıklayarak bir sonraki bölüme geçin.
ya da ekteki linkten dosyayı bulabilirsiniz; (ekteki linki kes yapıştır yoluyla internet arama çubuğuna kopyalayın) https://www.wetransfer.com/...0140731070819/3afebc
12) yeni açılan ''review your entries'' kısmında şimdiye kadar girmiş olduğunuz bilgiler listelenecektir. kontrol ettikten sonra ''next'' kutucuğunu işaretleyerek bir sonraki bölüme geçebilirsiniz.
13) yeni açılan sayfa olan ''submit form'' kısmı son bölüm ve şikâyetin resmi olarak kaydedildiğini gösteren bölüm.
burada yer alan ''this is your incident number. preserve it carefully'' denilen kısımda verilen kod sizin referans numaranız. bu referansı mutlaka bir yere kaydedin.
''password'' yazan kısma bir şifre belirleyerek yazın ve ''verify password'' yazan kısma da seçmiş olduğunuz şifreyi tekrar yazın.
''click here to confirm that...'' ile başlayan cümlenin başındaki kutucuğu işaretleyerek şifrenizi ve verilen referans numarasını kaydettiğinizi onaylayın.
not: şikâyetinize verilen cevabı görmek için verilen referansa ve şifrenize ihtiyacınız olacak. şikâyetinize verilecek olan cevabı 7 gün sonra görebileceksiniz.
son olarak tebrikler... yeni bir vatan hainliğine! imza attınız. tabi bu vatan hırsızların ve şikecilerin oluşturduğu vatan..."
aşağıda bordo mavi pusula'dan alıntı (büyük ihtimal ender kuyumcu imzalı) yazıyı göreceksiniz. ben nacizane bir başka girizgah yapmak isterim:
http://www.osahne.com/...ar.html#.U9ty2ON_sVe
"değerli arkadaşlar;
fifa'dan sonra uefa da şike ve usulsüzlüklerin bildirilmesi için bir şikâyet hattı oluşturdu ve bu hatta ister isminizi vererek isterse bilgilerinizi saklayarak şikâyette bulunabiliyorsunuz.
bizler de yeni kampanyamızda tff'nin yaptığı usulsüzlükleri ve uefa'nın şike davasını zamana yaymasının kabul edilemez olduğunu bu hatta bildiriyoruz.
şikâyet metni:
list of complaints:
1) turkish football federation protected match fixers by not relegating them as stated in its disciplinary regulations.
2) according to turkish prime minister, şenes erzik, vice president of uefa, played a key role between turkish prime minister, recep tayyip erdoğan, and mr. michel platini, which took the pressure of uefa off the turkish football federation.
3) according to cas award regarding fenerbahce case, uefa protected match fixers by not penalising them for match fixing. ( see clauses 575,576,577 below)
4) although uefa announced that the sanctions of individuals in this case were going to be announced as soon as possible over a year ago, uefa is yet to announce this decision.
5) tff signed a resolution about fighting against match fixing with uefa in astana, but failed to apply this aggreement on match fixers. ( see clauses 5f, 5g and 10 for more info on sanctions must be applied to match fixers)
fao uefa officer,
turkish football federation has been protecting teams involved in match fixing by not applying the disciplinary regulations stated in ıts status. all teams involved in match fixing must be relegated, but tff chose to protect these teams as a result of political intervention.
according to the turkish football federation disciplinary code 55/1(b) ; teams, whose board members are involved in match fixing or bribery, must be relegated to a lower division, but tff failed to apply this code so far…
on the other hand uefa failed to make sure tff follows the procedures...
before expressing the expectations of millions in turkey and all over the world from uefa, let’s have a look at some clauses of the resolution signed between uefa and the national federations in astana in 27.03.2014. which will give us an indication for our request;
article - 5. pursuant to their own regulations and practice and subject to the application of national law, to:
f) ensure that, in addition to individuals, clubs are also held responsible and sanctioned in circumstances where those with authority to act on behalf of the club are involved in match-fixing, attempted match-fixing, or any other form of corruption linked to match-fixing;
g) exclude match-fixing, attempted match-fixing, and any other form of corruption linked to match-fixing from any kind of statute of limitations.
article - 10. all member associations of uefa re-affirm that match-fixing, attempted match-fixing or other forms of corruption linked to match-fixing must be met with strong and sporting sanctions, such as the possibility of lifetime bans for officials, players, coaches or referees, and measures such as the deduction of points and/or relegation and/or exclusion from competition for clubs.
therefore, as turkish fans seeking justice, we expect uefa to act according to the statutes stated below and either make sure tff relegates fenerv-bahce sk and all other teams involved in match fixing and ban the individuals from football or suspend tff’s membership;
withdrawal and termination of membership, exclusion, dissolution of a member association:
article 8/ 3
a member association may be excluded from uefa if it has:
b) seriously breached these statutes or a regulation or decision made under them;
suspension: article 9; 1) if, in the opinion of the executive committee, a member association has committed a serious breach of these statutes or regulations or decisions made under them, the executive committee shall be entitled to suspend the membership of the member association with immediate effect.
therefore; it is fair to say that all teams involved in match fixing must be relegated and all individuals involved in match fixing must be banned from football up to life time in order to maintain the integrity of the game and make sure fair play is obtained.
according to swiss law, uefa board members and uefa appeals body members are committing a crime by misusing their duties and this is unacceptable.
most dissappointing part of this case for fans who trust uefa was after reading the cas award regarding fenerbahce sk case, millions in turkey have no doubt that uefa is part of this corruption too. uefa, not only protected fenerbahce sk from heavier sanction by not judging them from match fixing offence, but also prevented cas to inrease the sanction by not filing in an idependent apeal against the appealed decision. (see cas award below for details)
cas award:
575. in practise, this spectrum would mean that a "standard" match-fixing offence would, in principle, have to be sanctioned with a two-year period of ineligibility. in case of particularly serious match-fixing offences a higher sanction would have to be imposed and in case of mitigating circumstances the standard two-year period of ineligibility would have to be reduced.
576. in light of this spectrum of sanctions and considering that the match-fixing attempts initiated by fenerbahce's officials were particularly serious in comparison with previous match-fixing cases, the panel has no doubt to determine that a sanction from the higher region of this spectrum is warranted. the panel thereby specifically considers the fact that fenerbahce officials attempted to fix four matches, that multiple high-ranked fenerbahce officials were involved in the match-fixing scheme and that the match-fixing operations were conducted and orchestrated from the top administrative level of the club.
577. however, as uefa did not file an independent appeal against the appealed decision, the panel finds that it is limited in its discretion to sanction fenerbahce as it deems fit because it cannot go beyond the sanction imposed by the uefa appeals body. this would constitute a ruling ultra petita. as such, the panel cannot impose a higher sanction than a two-year period of ineligibility (in addition to the period of ineligibility already served through the equivalent of the "administrative measure") in the present appeals arbitration proceedings.
on the other hand uefa accepted fenerbahce sk's complaint regarding trabzonspor straight after lauching an investigation on fenerbahce sk even though trabzonspor was cleared off all charges at court, at ethical committee reports and at professional discipline committee trials… an application from a convicted match fixing criminal, such as fenerbahce sk, should had been declined by uefa, but uefa chose to take this appliction in to account, probably to justify their wrong doings in penalising fenerbahce sk with minimum sanction, rather than a heavier one as cas stated in its award. we see this as a threat to trabzonspor for defending their rights.
in the light of this threat, we would like to inform uefa officails once more that, we are aware of the relations and the talks between turkish prime minister, uefa’s president mr. michel platini and uefa vice-president şenes erzik, which changed mr. platini’s approach to the case dramatically. sponsorship of fenerbahce vice-president’s bank to uefa during the process and meeting took place in cyprus between platini and people from fenerbahce sk board are other key factors that changed platini’s, hence uefa’s approach to this case too…
another milestone to this case was the meeting between former presidents of turkish football federation (tff) and mr. platini took place in cyprus. mehmet ali aydınlar, former tff president, told press that he had a chance to convince mr. platini for point deduction rather than relegation at this meeting.
uefa also helped turkish authorities keep match fixers in football by not revealing sanctions of individuals. it has been over a year and uefa is yet to reach a verdict regarding individuals, where uefa declared that the verdicts were to be announced as soon as possible over a year ago.
with uefa's help turkish authorities kept aziz yıldırım outside the prision and with turkish pm's order a speacially picked court decided for a re-trial with no grounds. it was no surprise for turkish people that a retrial was decided by the new assigned court, as turkish pm promised a retrial to aziz yıldırım on the 22nd of january 2014, straight after supreme court certified his penalty on the 17th of january 2014.
regards
yapılacak olanlar:
1) ekteki linki kes yapıştır yoluyla internet arama çubuğuna kopyalayın: https://uefa.integrityline.org/# ve sağ üst köşedeki dil seçeneğinin ingilizce (english) olduğundan emin olun.
2) ''file a report'' yazan kutucuğu tıklayın şikâyet işlemine başlayın.
3) ''what is it about?'' kısmında, ortadaki seçenek olan ''corruption'' seçeneğini işaretleyin ve ''next'' kutucuğunu tıklayın
4) ''your personal details'' kısmı kişisel bilgilerinizi girdiğiniz kısımdır. kişisel bilgilerinizin gizli kalmasını istiyorsanız ''i would like to remain anonymous'' yazan kısmın başındaki kutuda yer alan işareti bırakın, size mail ya da başka bir yolla geri dönüş yapılmasını istiyorsanız kutucukta yer alan işareti üstüne tıklayarak kaldırın ve bilgilerinizi girin.
bilgilerini vermek isteyenler için:
first name: isminiz
last name: soy isminiz
position: ''football fan'' yazabilirsiniz.
e-mail kısmına mail adresinizi yazın.
phone number kısmına da türkiye'nin alan kodu olan 0090'la başlayarak telefonunuzu yazın.
son olarak da sağ alt köşede yer alan ''next'' kutucuğunu tıklayıp bir sonraki aşamaya geçin.
5) şikâyetinizi detaylı olarak anlatmanız istenen ''detailed description'' bölümü açılacak ve sizden konuyla ilgili bilgi vermeniz istenecek.
ilk kutucuk olan ''please describe the incident as accurately and in as much detail possible'' kısmına ''t f f and u e f a must act against match fixers in order to maintain justice anf prove that they are not part of corruption'' yazın
6) ''name of home and away team'' kısmına ''convicted match fixers'' yazın.
7) ''match date'' kısmını boş bırakın
8) ''competition'' kısmına ''domestic'' yazın.
9) ''how did you hear about this incident'' kısmına ''common knowledge'' yazın.
10) ''do you have any proof to support your information'' kısmına ''yes.'' yazın ve sağ alt köşede yer alan ''next'' kutucuğunu tıklayın.
11) yeni açılan ''upload documents'' kısmına yükleyebilmek için yukarıda yer alan ''metni bir word dosyasına kaydedin'' ve ''search'' kutucuğuna tıklayarak bilgisayarınıza kaydetmiş olduğunuz bu dosyayı yükleyin ve ''upload'' kutucuğuna tıklayarak yüklemeyi tamamlandıktan sonra sağ alt köşedeki ''next'' kutucuğuna tıklayarak bir sonraki bölüme geçin.
ya da ekteki linkten dosyayı bulabilirsiniz; (ekteki linki kes yapıştır yoluyla internet arama çubuğuna kopyalayın) https://www.wetransfer.com/...0140731070819/3afebc
12) yeni açılan ''review your entries'' kısmında şimdiye kadar girmiş olduğunuz bilgiler listelenecektir. kontrol ettikten sonra ''next'' kutucuğunu işaretleyerek bir sonraki bölüme geçebilirsiniz.
13) yeni açılan sayfa olan ''submit form'' kısmı son bölüm ve şikâyetin resmi olarak kaydedildiğini gösteren bölüm.
burada yer alan ''this is your incident number. preserve it carefully'' denilen kısımda verilen kod sizin referans numaranız. bu referansı mutlaka bir yere kaydedin.
''password'' yazan kısma bir şifre belirleyerek yazın ve ''verify password'' yazan kısma da seçmiş olduğunuz şifreyi tekrar yazın.
''click here to confirm that...'' ile başlayan cümlenin başındaki kutucuğu işaretleyerek şifrenizi ve verilen referans numarasını kaydettiğinizi onaylayın.
not: şikâyetinize verilen cevabı görmek için verilen referansa ve şifrenize ihtiyacınız olacak. şikâyetinize verilecek olan cevabı 7 gün sonra görebileceksiniz.
son olarak tebrikler... yeni bir vatan hainliğine! imza attınız. tabi bu vatan hırsızların ve şikecilerin oluşturduğu vatan..."
