35
http://www.tas-cas.org/...a-proportionate.html
şöyle bir karar açıklamış kurum.
--- alıntı ---
lausanne, 20 july 2018 – the court of arbitration for sport (cas) has issued its decision in the
arbitration procedure between the ac milan and the union européenne de football association
(uefa) in relation to the appeal filed at cas by ac milan against the decision issued by the
adjudicatory chamber of the uefa club financial control body (uefa cfcb) dated 19 june 2018.
the adjudicatory chamber of the uefa cfcb determined that ac milan had failed to fulfil the
break-even requirement set out in articles 58 to 63 of the applicable uefa club licensing and
financial fair play regulations and excluded ac milan from participating in the next uefa club
competition for which it would otherwise qualify in the next 2 seasons (i.e. in 2018/19 or 2019/20).
on 4 july 2018, ac milan filed an appeal at the cas seeking the annulment of the cfcb adjudicatory
chamber decision. the arbitration procedure was conducted by a cas panel composed of prof. dr.
ulrich haas (germany), president, mr pierre muller (switzerland), and mr mark hovell (uk) who
held a hearing in the presence of the parties on 19 july 2018 at the cas headquarters in lausanne,
switzerland.
the cas panel in charge of the arbitration has partially upheld ac milan’s appeal and has ruled as
follows:
- the decision of the adjudicatory chamber of the uefa cfcb rendered on 19 june 2018
establishing that ac milan has failed to fulfil the break-even requirement is confirmed;
- the decision of the adjudicatory chamber of the uefa cfcb rendered on 19 june 2018 to
exclude ac milan from participating in the next uefa club competition for which it would
otherwise qualify in the next two (2) seasons (i.e. the 2018/19 and 2019/20 seasons) is annulled;
- the case is referred back to the adjudicatory chamber of the uefa cfcb to issue a
proportionate disciplinary measure.
the cas panel rejected ac milan’s request to order uefa to enter into a settlement agreement but
acknowledged that the decision of the adjudicatory chamber of the uefa cfcb to exclude ac milan
from the uefa club competition was not proportionate.
the panel considered that some important elements have not been properly assessed by the
adjudicatory chamber, or could not be properly assessed at the moment when the appealed decision
was rendered (19 june 2018), and noted in particular that the current financial situation of the club
was now better, following the recent change in the club’s ownership.
the panel decided to refer the case back to the adjudicatory chamber of the uefa cfcb because
the club had requested that the case be referred back to uefa and because it considers that the
adjudicatory chamber is in a better position than the cas panel to issue a new proportionate
disciplinary measure on the basis of the current financial situation of the club.
the panel has issued its decision without the grounds, which will follow at a later date.
--- alıntı ---
gazeteler çok ateşli girmiş mevzuya ancak benim anladığım:
cas, milan'ın itirazını kabul etmiş. 2 yıl avrupa'dan men cezasını onaylamayarak daha orantılı cezalar verilmesi için kararı yargılama dairesine göndermiş.
cas ayrıca milan'ın yeni bir uzlaşma (settlement agreement) önerisini reddetmiş.
açıklamanın devamında milan kulübü'nün mevcut durumdaki finansal durumunun, eskiye göre daha iyi olduğu da yazıyor.
yorumum:
2 yıllık men cezasının çok olduğu düşünülerek 1 yıla çekilebilir. yeni bir settlement agreement yapılmasını zaten direkt açıkça reddetmişler. bence bunların bizi örnek göstererek vızıldamasının en önemli sebebi mustafa the settlement agreement cengiz reis'in yeni uzlaşmaya uefa'yı ikna etmesiydi. neyse o taraftan babayı almış milan. men cezalarının komple kalkacağını sanmıyorum 1 yıla inecektir. haa paragöz ve rüşvetçi uefa 30 m eur cezayı 50 m eur yapıp men cezasını komple kaldırır mı bilemiyorum.
ekleme: durumlarımız farklı. kimse milan'a verilen kararlardan bizim tarafa pay çıkarmasın. zaten mustafa cengiz çatır çatır bu y.vşaklar sebebiyle bizim kararın değiştirilmeyeceğini söylemişti. başkana inanalım, ayık olalım.
şöyle bir karar açıklamış kurum.
--- alıntı ---
lausanne, 20 july 2018 – the court of arbitration for sport (cas) has issued its decision in the
arbitration procedure between the ac milan and the union européenne de football association
(uefa) in relation to the appeal filed at cas by ac milan against the decision issued by the
adjudicatory chamber of the uefa club financial control body (uefa cfcb) dated 19 june 2018.
the adjudicatory chamber of the uefa cfcb determined that ac milan had failed to fulfil the
break-even requirement set out in articles 58 to 63 of the applicable uefa club licensing and
financial fair play regulations and excluded ac milan from participating in the next uefa club
competition for which it would otherwise qualify in the next 2 seasons (i.e. in 2018/19 or 2019/20).
on 4 july 2018, ac milan filed an appeal at the cas seeking the annulment of the cfcb adjudicatory
chamber decision. the arbitration procedure was conducted by a cas panel composed of prof. dr.
ulrich haas (germany), president, mr pierre muller (switzerland), and mr mark hovell (uk) who
held a hearing in the presence of the parties on 19 july 2018 at the cas headquarters in lausanne,
switzerland.
the cas panel in charge of the arbitration has partially upheld ac milan’s appeal and has ruled as
follows:
- the decision of the adjudicatory chamber of the uefa cfcb rendered on 19 june 2018
establishing that ac milan has failed to fulfil the break-even requirement is confirmed;
- the decision of the adjudicatory chamber of the uefa cfcb rendered on 19 june 2018 to
exclude ac milan from participating in the next uefa club competition for which it would
otherwise qualify in the next two (2) seasons (i.e. the 2018/19 and 2019/20 seasons) is annulled;
- the case is referred back to the adjudicatory chamber of the uefa cfcb to issue a
proportionate disciplinary measure.
the cas panel rejected ac milan’s request to order uefa to enter into a settlement agreement but
acknowledged that the decision of the adjudicatory chamber of the uefa cfcb to exclude ac milan
from the uefa club competition was not proportionate.
the panel considered that some important elements have not been properly assessed by the
adjudicatory chamber, or could not be properly assessed at the moment when the appealed decision
was rendered (19 june 2018), and noted in particular that the current financial situation of the club
was now better, following the recent change in the club’s ownership.
the panel decided to refer the case back to the adjudicatory chamber of the uefa cfcb because
the club had requested that the case be referred back to uefa and because it considers that the
adjudicatory chamber is in a better position than the cas panel to issue a new proportionate
disciplinary measure on the basis of the current financial situation of the club.
the panel has issued its decision without the grounds, which will follow at a later date.
--- alıntı ---
gazeteler çok ateşli girmiş mevzuya ancak benim anladığım:
cas, milan'ın itirazını kabul etmiş. 2 yıl avrupa'dan men cezasını onaylamayarak daha orantılı cezalar verilmesi için kararı yargılama dairesine göndermiş.
cas ayrıca milan'ın yeni bir uzlaşma (settlement agreement) önerisini reddetmiş.
açıklamanın devamında milan kulübü'nün mevcut durumdaki finansal durumunun, eskiye göre daha iyi olduğu da yazıyor.
yorumum:
2 yıllık men cezasının çok olduğu düşünülerek 1 yıla çekilebilir. yeni bir settlement agreement yapılmasını zaten direkt açıkça reddetmişler. bence bunların bizi örnek göstererek vızıldamasının en önemli sebebi mustafa the settlement agreement cengiz reis'in yeni uzlaşmaya uefa'yı ikna etmesiydi. neyse o taraftan babayı almış milan. men cezalarının komple kalkacağını sanmıyorum 1 yıla inecektir. haa paragöz ve rüşvetçi uefa 30 m eur cezayı 50 m eur yapıp men cezasını komple kaldırır mı bilemiyorum.
ekleme: durumlarımız farklı. kimse milan'a verilen kararlardan bizim tarafa pay çıkarmasın. zaten mustafa cengiz çatır çatır bu y.vşaklar sebebiyle bizim kararın değiştirilmeyeceğini söylemişti. başkana inanalım, ayık olalım.
